Effects of gap findings in literature review Essay Solved
Gaps Findings in Literature Review
Gaps in research are referred to as the areas that have been omitted, offering vague information or insufficiently explored, providing either biased information or inconsistent results (Winchester, & Salji, 2016). These gaps can be misleading and can limit the ability of stakeholders, especially in making the decisions that reflect the purpose of the research. The repercussions of investing in the wrong implementation strategies are very costly because the plan strategy is wrong, and also can create more problems. The gap findings in the literature review can be identified when focuses to read across the breadth of each journal or article they are reviewing. They should themselves with a wide range of research articles ensure they use a variety of research methods as much as possible. The searching technique known as nesting can be very appropriate in this case.
Effects of gaps in the literature review
According to Booth, Sutton, & Papaioannou (2016), the effects of gaps can be beneficial and at the same time, create some hindrance when trying to create change in an organization. As mentioned before if the results provided do not provide the intended answers for the research question, then there will be a limitation in providing solutions. Because of the unmet objectives, the research can be done again, or correction is done on the current, which is very costly. On the other hand, these gap findings can be beneficial by providing a challenge to the stakeholders where they will identify other areas of research. This demonstrates excellent research skills which are beneficial in providing solutions for the organization. Garrard (2016), states that, when different research findings are incorporated, it makes it easy for the stakeholders to identify more gaps, provide solution and also help them in making significant decisions for the organization.
References
Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. Sage.
Garrard, J. (2016). Health sciences literature review made easy. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Winchester, C. L., & Salji, M. (2016). Writing a literature review. Journal of Clinical Urology, 9(5), 308-312.
