Method for Evaluating Evidence in healthcare
Methods
The two most commonly used methods for evaluating evidence are systematic review and randomized controlled trial.
P.S! This is not a full paper, just a snippet of what we can do for you!
The middle part has been cut out
Click Me, Place an order & get an 100% original custom paper. No plagiarism!
Comparison
Both methods are study designs that evaluate scientific research and its application on the practical environment. They both use the findings or results as a baseline of analysis and evaluation of the effectiveness of specific study evidence. All these methods are relevant and applicable to clinical issues. They both take a given period to come up with a report on the evaluated evidence. They both tabulate the information collected and describe the findings on the evaluated evidence. They both follow specific criteria such as PRISMA for systematic review and randomized sequence grouping for randomized controlled trial (Basch et al., 2016).
Differences
A randomized controlled trial involves assigning participants into an experimental group using a random sequence while systematic review utilizes statistical data that are combined from individual studies. .
P.S! This is not a full paper, just a snippet of what we can do for you!
The middle part has been cut out
Click Me, Place an order & get an 100% original custom paper. No plagiarism!
Systematic reviews prepare a robust and substantial electronic bibliographic database for research pieces of evidence while randomized controlled trials involve few general observations on the outcomes of the intervention under study based on the groups used. The systematic review builds around literature search methods whereas randomized controlled trials are based on practical experiments on individuals (Moher et al., 2015).
References
Basch, E., Deal, A. M., Kris, M. G., Scher, H. I., Hudis, C. A., Sabbatini, P., … & Chou, J. F. (2016). Symptom monitoring with patient-reported outcomes during routine cancer treatment: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 34(6), 557.
Brownson, R. C., Deshpande, A. D., & Gillespie, K. N. (2017). Evidence-based public health. Oxford university press.
Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., … & Stewart, L. A. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic reviews, 4(1), 1.
