Process Evaluation: Rationale for the methods used in collecting the outcome data full custom essay
The effectiveness of the community-based program would remain valid if the
stakeholders and the preceptor work in unison to monitor the progress of the intervention in
place. The desired change, as described in the implementation process, includes the use of
preventive community services through screening for suicide while relying on family-physician
partnerships. Besides, community education got involved in increasing awareness of school-
based programs. The methods that got identified, and we opted to build on in the collection of
data include a pretest, a pilot study, surveys /questionnaires.
A pretest usually enables researchers to get insight into the type of information one can
obtain from performance tests. As a result, we applied pretests before administering the program
in the community in measuring the community and adolescents' attitudes, knowledge, and skills
about suicide among the young people to obtain baseline data. During the implementation of the
program, the stakeholders used standard surveys which were open-ended to collect quantitative
data. The standard questionnaires were essential in gathering information from the community
group of individuals to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention in tackling the social issue
of suicide among adolescents. (Djalalinia, Owlia, Malekafzali, Ghanei, Babamahmoodi, &
Peykari, 2014).
How the outcome measures evaluate the extent to which the project objectives are
achieved.
Outcome measurement speaks a lot regarding the elements of an implemented program.
Moreover, it gives room to rind on the program's intended impacts, and whether or not they are
at the verge of being achieved. From the measurement of the results, an assessment against the
PROCESS EVALUATION 3
set goals or objectives describes progress. Positive outcome measures would present in the
realization of more than half of the set target whereas adverse outcomes involve increased
program costs, failure of completion of the intervention and a low percentage of below half of
the set target regarding reducing the cases of adolescent suicide.
How the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the evidence.
Setting up an effective plan for an effective outcome measurement outlines the ways and
process involved in evaluating. The use of performance indicators which are specific and
observable based on the program would get utilized to meet the reliability of the indicators.
(Kerzner, & Kerzner, 2017). Besides, consideration and utilization of the performance indicators
in terms of their thoroughness yet realistic strive to shed light on the program's validity and
applicability in the setting and with the target subjects. Outcomes would also get measured
against the outlined targets based on specific timelines, using similar standards, and the baseline
data obtained to assess progress. Subsequently, measuring of outcomes proves the correlation of
project elements.
Strategies to take if outcomes do not provide positive results
In cases of poor project outcomes, a redesign for the same project is paramount to ensure
positive results. (Posavac, 2015). I would foster a movement with the influential leaders to get
back to the drawing board and get the basics of the project right. In essence, we would redefine
the critical components of the program life cycle. In some circumstances, we would strive to
align the project with the ultimate objectives to enable stakeholders to stick to the goal. Again,
majoring on prioritization of the project activities to maintain order and enhance unity.
PROCESS EVALUATION 4
Communication of challenges would get done promptly in an honest manner to receive helpful
feedback in propelling and sustaining the project.
Implications for practice and future research
Health care providers in their settings of work have an obligate responsibility for bridging
gaps in the community. Ultimately, they ought to go beyond the scope of practice and engage in
preventive measures that would positively influence positive behaviors among adolescents in
society. A deeper understanding of the potential risks and predisposing factors that undermine
the health of individuals or cost their lives should remain the priority. Further, according to
Lewallen, Hunt, Potts‐Datema, Zaza & Giles (2015), integrated services in the community
settings ranging from support and community based educative programs go a long way in
creating health awareness on malpractice among individuals to compromise their well-being. As
a result, I would recommend that collaborative measures with stakeholders in the community,
those in the health care system and the community members have a critical role in preventing
adverse health outcomes in societies.
PROCESS EVALUATION 5
References
Djalalinia, S., Owlia, P., Malekafzali, H., Ghanei, M., Babamahmoodi, A., & Peykari, N. (2014).
Project monitoring and evaluation: An enhancing method for health research system
management. International journal of preventive medicine, 5(4), 505.
Kerzner, H., & Kerzner, H. R. (2017). Project management: a systems approach to planning,
scheduling, and controlling. John Wiley & Sons.
Lewallen, T. C., Hunt, H., Potts‐Datema, W., Zaza, S., & Giles, W. (2015). The whole school,
whole community, whole child model: A new approach for improving educational
attainment and healthy development for students. Journal of School Health, 85(11), 729-
739.
Posavac, E. J. (2015). Program evaluation: Methods and case studies. Routledge.
