Critiquing Qualitative and Quantitative Studies
The Qualitative Study Article:
A qualitative study to explore views of patients, caters, and mental health professionals to inform cultural adaptation of CbT for psychosis in China
P.S! This is not a full paper, just a snippet of what we can do for you!
The middle part has been cut out
Click Me, Place an order & get an 100% original custom paper. No plagiarism!
In this article, the research issue provided is lack of evidence for the effectiveness of Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT) in low and middle-income countries. The research question is not stated, but its purpose is to ensure cultural adaptation of CBT. The researcher pre-understanding is evident by recognition of recommendation of CBT in UK and US but poor utilization in third world countries. The literature review is not presented on its own but included in the introduction. It contains various opinions regarding the authors’ understanding. It is relevant to the study title and provides a summarized overview of the whole study. The author critiques this paper that is, the mental health professionals interviewed group resided in the city. The theoretical framework is on healthcare providing to people with a mental health condition which is relevant to nursing practice.
P.S! This is not a full paper, just a snippet of what we can do for you!
The middle part has been cut out
Click Me, Place an order & get an 100% original custom paper. No plagiarism!
The participants in this research were patients with schizophrenia, their caregivers, and mental health professionals in the hospital setting. They were recruited using purposive sampling. This type of participant sampling was appropriate and relevant to the study. The study protected human research participants in that, their details. The research design was based on data collection following the principles of scientific research.
The Quantitative Study Article:
Cognitive behavioural therapy for patients with schizophrenia: a multicenter randomized controlled trial in Beijing
In this article, the research issue is that long-term pharmacotherapy is associated with a range of adverse effects and poor adherence. The research question is not posted, but the purpose of this project is to compare the efficacy of CBT and supportive therapy (SP) for patients with schizophrenia in China. The researcher shows pre-understanding on schizophrenia data regarding WHO findings. The literature review is not provided separately but incorporated into the introduction part. It provides a summary of the whole study and contains opinions on the management of schizophrenia. The author offers no critique regarding the literature review. The theoretical framework circumnavigates around health condition management that conforms to nursing practice.
P.S! This is not a full paper, just a snippet of what we can do for you!
The middle part has been cut out
Click Me, Place an order & get an 100% original custom paper. No plagiarism!
The participants in this study were 192 patients; the study was conducted in the hospital setting that is in three specialized psychiatric hospitals in Beijing, China. Criteria sampling was employed where patients were recruited using specific qualifications. The sample population was appropriate and adequate for the study. This research protected human research participants such that it never included their details and identity in the paper. The paper adheres to the principle of scientific research design.
Values of both research approaches
Advantages of qualitative study
Disadvantages of a qualitative study
The quality of this project depends on the skills of the researcher. Thus, it can easily be affected by personal characteristics and biases.
Advantages of quantitative study
It provides a fast and efficient way of studying a population. 192 patients selected are taken to represent a larger population. ..
Disadvantages of a quantitative study
P.S! This is not a full paper, just a snippet of what we can do for you!
The middle part has been cut out
Click Me, Place an order & get an 100% original custom paper. No plagiarism!
Response to qualitative study claim
The claim that qualitative research is not real science is valid. This study has no validity because it is based on views or responses to open-ended questions of which participants might misinterpret questions. Also, the data is extensive, detailed, and hard to manage. It lacks reliability; there is no consistency in getting the same findings at all time with the similar process. The qualitative study uses a small number of participants; therefore, the results do not qualify to apply to a large population scientifically. It is also rarely published due to errors and incorrectly written reports in it. Qualitative research is not based on standards, and it builds more around personal experiences and views (Packer, 2017).
References
Bryman, A. (2017). Quantitative and qualitative research: further reflections on their integration. In Mixing methods: Qualitative and quantitative research (pp. 57-78). Routledge.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
Green, J., & Thorogood, N. (2018). Qualitative methods for health research. Sage.
Hammersley, M. (2017). Deconstructing the qualitative-quantitative divide 1. In Mixing methods: Qualitative and quantitative research (pp. 39-55). Routledge.
Nieswiadomy, R. M., & Bailey, C. (2017). Foundations of nursing research. Pearson.
Packer, M. J. (2017). The science of qualityative research. Cambridge University Press.
