Ethical Decision Making
Moral status, often in life we so feel obligated to various individuals concerning various paradigms self. It’s over time been thought that only human beings have moral standing. However, Immanuel Kant does not attempt to convince anyone that morality does exist, all he is trying to prove is that people behave by what we deem moral most of the time. The only thing that is moral is only is the “good will” (Kant., 2017) for it is not the consequences of one’s action that matters but instead doing them for the right reasons out of respect for the general good. Thus moral ideas are compelling and morality is a set of rules imposed on one’s self, thus grounding morality within logic. Because humans have self-awareness or sophisticated cognitive capacity, language and rationality, however, this begs the question whether only human beings have these capacities. However, according to Peter Singer, no matter which position that we as humans choose, there always will be a non-human object (an animal) that will ever possess that similar capacity more than one human, for instance, infants or severely ill individuals (Singer., 2009).
Evidently, as per philosophers, the sole capacity humans have is a membership to the same biological group, homo sapiens. Debates still thought up, and it was viewed that, maybe, life itself does give us moral status, however, prevalently, sentience (capacity to have conscious experiences) is the only tool gifted to us by evolution to survive and reproduce.
P.S! This is not a full paper, just a snippet of what we can do for you!
The middle part has been cut out
Click Me, Place an order & get an 100% original custom paper. No plagiarism!
Personally, I would opt for the theory based on moral agency, having no capacity to make decisions about the rightness or wrongness of an action, the fetus is not viable to determine the course of action taken thus seal its fate. The parents and the doctor should act in such a manner that the best interests of the clients are looked after and given priority. With this theory, an abortion is imminent. As for any couple that will report to the clinic with a similar condition, I would offer the same advice and I would like most health care professionals top embrace such. Owing to the quality of life they would want to adopt, a differently abled child will be a drag in their lives, the constant attention and inability to adequately supply to their child would be a primary cause of worry to the family.
P.S! This is not a full paper, just a snippet of what we can do for you!
The middle part has been cut out
Click Me, Place an order & get an 100% original custom paper. No plagiarism!
Having looked at the various theories of morality, it is vital to note that one cannot merely escape from logic. However, it is indispensable to respect other people’s status as beings of moral worth as well as respect ourselves. And cleave to our moral voices, treat people as an end, not as a means. Concerning that, doctors should keep in mind that patients have their purposes. Embracing universal laws and opt to provide to their patients that which they would wish to be adopted by all patients. Regardless of the therapeutic option chose for, the ethical considerations are always immense. Thus, whichever opted for, the willingness of all parties to do it and the universal acceptance should be of priority.
References.
Ash A (2000) Why I haven’t changed my mind about prenatal testing reflections and refinements. In: Prenatal Testing and Disability Rights (eds E. Parens & A. Asch), pp. 234-58 Georgetown University Press, Washington.
Edward S. (2001) Prevention of Disability on the grounds of suffering. Journal of Medical Ethics 27,380-2.
Harman, E. (1999). Creation ethics: The moral status of early fetuses and the ethics of abortion.
Philosophy and Public Affairs, 28(4), 310–324
Kant, I. (2017). Kant: The metaphysics of morals. Cambridge University Press.
Singer, P. (2009). Speciesism and moral status. Metaphilosophy, 40(3‐4), 567-581.
Wendell S. (1996) The Rejected Body: Feminist Philosophical Reflections on Disability. Routledge, London.
