How to Write Nursing Thesis Statements

Title: How to Write Effective Nursing Thesis Statements – Understanding the Basics

Do you know the fundamentals of writing nursing thesis statements? A thesis statement is a concise expression of the central argument and purpose of your academic paper. It is often referred to simply as the “thesis.” Every scholarly paper should have a thesis statement, and strong thesis statements are characterized by being concise, specific, and debatable. Concise means keeping the thesis statement short, typically one or two sentences for shorter papers. Specific means focusing on a narrow and well-defined topic that is appropriate for the length of the paper. Debatability implies that a scholar in your field could potentially disagree with the statement.

Table of Contents

Order a custom-written paper now

Effective thesis statements address specific intellectual questions, present clear positions, and follow a structure that mirrors the overall organization of the paper. Continue reading to gain a deeper understanding of constructing a strong thesis statement.

Being Specific in Nursing Thesis Statements

This thesis statement lacks specificity in its argument:

– Needs Improvement: In this essay, I will examine two scholarly articles to find similarities and differences.

While this statement is concise, it lacks specificity and debatability. Readers may wonder which scholarly articles are being discussed, the paper’s topic, and the author’s field of study. Additionally, the purpose of the paper, which is to “examine…to find similarities and differences,” does not meet the scholarly level of analysis. While identifying similarities and differences is a good starting point, a robust academic argument goes beyond comparison to analyze the implications and meaning of those similarities and differences.

– Improved: In this essay, I will argue that combining Bowler’s (2003) autocratic management style with Smith’s (2007) theory of social cognition can effectively reduce the costs associated with employee turnover.

The revised statement is still concise while being specific and debatable. It clearly mentions concrete ideas, such as the authors’ names, and provides insight into the field (business) and topic (management and employee turnover). The statement is debatable because it goes beyond mere comparison and draws conclusions from that comparison, stating that this combination “can reduce the costs associated with employee turnover.”

Making a Unique Argument

This thesis draft fails to present a unique argument and instead repeats the language of the writing prompt:

– Needs Improvement: The purpose of this essay is to monitor, assess, and evaluate an educational program for its strengths and weaknesses. Then, I will provide suggestions for improvement.

In this case, the student has merely restated the paper’s assignment without specifying how they will address it. To rectify this, the student should formulate the thesis statement as a specific answer to the assignment prompt.

– Improved: Through a series of student interviews, I discovered that Kennedy High School’s antibullying program was ineffective. To address conflicts among students, I argue that Kennedy High School should adopt the policies outlined by the California Department of Education (2010).

By using words like “ineffective” and “argue,” the student demonstrates a clear analysis of the assignment and materials. They present a specific and debatable position. The use of concrete information, such as “student interviews” and “antibullying,” prepares the reader for the paper’s body and shows how the student has addressed the assignment prompt without mere restatement.

Creating a Debate in Nursing Thesis Statements

This thesis statement states an obvious fact or provides a plot summary instead of an argument:

– Needs Improvement: Leadership is an important quality in nurse educators.

To determine if a thesis statement is too broad and non-debatable, ask yourself, “Would a scholar in my field disagree with this point?” In this case, it is evident that no scholar would argue that leadership is unimportant for nurse educators. The student needs to formulate a more arguable and narrower claim, as shorter papers require a more focused topic than a dissertation.

– Improved: Roderick’s (2009) theory of participatory leadership is particularly relevant to nurse educators in the emergency medicine field, where collegial and kinesthetic learning benefits students the most.

Here, the student identifies a specific type of leadership (“participatory leadership”), narrowing down the topic, and makes an arguable claim that this type of leadership is “relevant” to a specific type of nurse educator. It allows for potential disagreement among scholars in the nursing field. The student’s paper can then proceed by providing specific evidence to support this central claim.

Choosing the Right Words

This thesis statement uses scholarly-sounding words without conveying substantial meaning:

– Needs Improvement: Scholars should work to seize metacognitive outcomes by harnessing discipline-based networks to empower collaborative infrastructures.

While there are several words that might be buzzwords in the student’s field or key terms borrowed from other texts, they fail to communicate a clear and specific meaning when combined. Students sometimes mistakenly believe that scholarly writing involves constructing complex sentences using specialized language. However, it is generally better to opt for clear and simple sentences. Remember that your ideas should be complex, not your sentence structure.

– Improved: Ecologists should educate the U.S. public on conservation methods by leveraging local and national green organizations to develop a comprehensive communication plan.

In the revised statement, the field (ecology) is clear, and the language is more specific to the field (“conservation methods,” “green organizations”), allowing readers to grasp the student’s communicated ideas.

Leaving Room for Discussion

This thesis statement is not conducive to development or advancement in the paper:

– Needs Improvement: There are always alternatives to illegal drug use.

This sample thesis statement makes a claim, but it does not provide room for extensive discussion. Such a claim may be suitable for a conclusion but leaves the student with no further points to explore in the paper. If there are “always alternatives” to the identified problem, why develop a paper around that claim? Ideally, a thesis statement should be complex enough to be explored throughout the entire paper’s length.

– Improved: The most effective treatment plan for methamphetamine addiction may involve a combination of pharmacological and cognitive therapy, as argued by Baker (2008), Smith (2009), and Xavier (2011).

In the revised thesis, the student presents a specific, debatable claim that has the potential to generate extensive discussion. The thesis statement raises further questions that can be explored. The initial example lacked any implied additional questions, but the revised example allows for more in-depth exploration.

Extra Tips on Writing Nursing Thesis Statements

Thesis Mad Libs

If you find it challenging to begin, try using the following models to generate a rough thesis statement. Remember, these models are only intended for drafting purposes and should not be included in your final work.

– In this essay, I argue ____, using ______ to assert _____.
– While scholars have often argued ______, I argue______, because_______.
– Through an analysis of ______, I argue ______, which is important because_______.

Words to Avoid and Embrace

When crafting your thesis statement, avoid using words like “explore, investigate, learn, compile, summarize, and explain” to describe the main purpose of your paper. These words suggest a summary or reporting approach rather than an analytical and synthesizing one.

Instead, consider using words like “argue, critique, question, and interrogate.” These analytical terms can help you start with a strong and specific scholarly position.