Week 6 Assignment: Reading Research Literature (RRL) Worksheet (graded)
Assignment Directions:
Read over each of the following directions, the required Reading Research Literature worksheet, and grading rubric.
Review the following link which contains a tutorial for your Week 6 Assignment. Click here for transcript. (Links to an external site.)
https://lms.courselearn.net/
Download and complete the required Reading Research Literature (RRL) worksheet (Links to an external site.).
Download or access the required article. The required article must be used.
de Araujo, D. D., Silva, D. V. A., Rodrigues, C. A. O., Silva, P. O., Macieira, T. G. R., & Chianca, T. C. M. (2019). Effectiveness of nursing interventions to prevent dry eye in critically ill patients. American Journal of Critical Care, 28(4), 299–306. Retrieved from https://chamberlainuniversity.
You must use the grading rubric to ensure you are meeting all grading criteria of the worksheet.
You are required to complete the worksheet using the productivity tools required by Chamberlain University, which is Microsoft Office Word 2013 (or later version), or Windows and Office 2011 (or later version) for MAC. You must save the file in the \”.docx\” format. Do NOT save as Word Pad. A later version of the productivity tool includes Office 365, which is available to Chamberlain students for FREE by downloading from the student portal at http://my.chamberlain.edu (Links to an external site.). Click on the envelope at the top of the page.
Use correct grammar, spelling, punctuation, and in-text APA formatting.
Submit the completed Reading Research Literature Worksheet to the Week 6 Assignment.
Reminder
Before preparing your assignment, please review this \”Crediting Sources Made Simple (Links to an external site.)\” resource. This tool is intended to help you understand scholarly writing, APA, referencing, and crediting. Please reach out to your instructor with any questions as you prepare your assignment.
**Academic Integrity**
Chamberlain College of Nursing values honesty and integrity. All students should be aware of the Academic Integrity policy and follow it in all discussions and assignments.
By submitting this assignment, I pledge on my honor that all content contained is my own original work except as quoted and cited appropriately. I have not received any unauthorized assistance on this assignment. Please see the grading criteria and rubrics on this page.
Please see the grading criteria and rubrics on this page.
NOTE: Please use your browser\’s File setting to save or print this page.
References
American Association of Colleges of Nurses (AACN). (2008). Executive summary: The essentials of baccalaureate education for professional nursing practice (2008). Retrieved from http://www.aacnnursing.org/
Quality and Safety Education for Nurses (QSEN). (2018). Quality and safety education for nurses competencies. Retrieved from http://qsen.org/competencies/
Rubric
NR439 Reading Research Literature Worksheet Rubric
NR439 Reading Research Literature Worksheet Rubric
I uploaded the worksheet that needs to be used for this assignment. The required article must be used for the worksheet. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks de Araujo, D. D., Silva, D. V. A., Rodrigues, C. A. O., Silva, P. O., Macieira, T. G. R., & Chianca, T. C. M. (2019). Effectiveness of nursing interventions to prevent dry eye in critically ill patients. American Journal of Critical Care, 28(4), 299–306. Retrieved from https://chamberlainuniversity.
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePurpose of the Study
Using information from the required article and mostly your words, thoroughly summarize the purpose of the study. Describe what the study is about. Provide details.
30.0 pts
Thoroughly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.
26.0 pts
Mostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details.
24.0 pts
Minimally summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria is missing. Fair details provided.
11.0 pts
Poorly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Vague details provided.
0.0 pts
All criteria from the first column are missing.
30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeType of Research & the Design
Using information from the required article and your own words, summarize the description of the type of research and the design of the study. Include how it supports the purpose (aim or intent) of the study. Provide details.
20.0 pts
Thoroughly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.
18.0 pts
Mostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details.
16.0 pts
Minimally summarizes the criteria in the first column one criteria is missing. Fair details provided.
8.0 pts
Poorly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Vague details are provided.
0.0 pts
All criteria from the first column are missing.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSample
Using information from the required article and your own words, summarize the population (sample) for the study; include key characteristics, sample size, sampling technique. Provide details.
20.0 pts
Thoroughly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.
18.0 pts
Mostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details.
16.0 pts
Minimally summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria is missing. Fair details provided.
8.0 pts
Poorly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Vague details are provided.
0.0 pts
All criteria from the first column are missing.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeData Collection
Using information from the required article and your own words, summarize one data that was collected and how the data was collected from the study. Provide details.
20.0 pts
Thoroughly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.
18.0 pts
Mostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details
16.0 pts
Minimally summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria is missing. Fair details are provided.
8.0 pts
Poorly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Vague details are provided.
0.0 pts
All criteria from the first column are missing.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeData Analysis
Using information from the required article and your own words, summarize one of the data analysis/ tests performed or one method of data analysis from the study; include what you know/learned about the descriptive or statistical test or data analysis method. Provide details.
20.0 pts
Thoroughly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.
18.0 pts
Mostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details.
16.0 pts
Minimally summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria is missing. Fair details are provided.
8.0 pts
Poorly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Vague details are provided.
0.0 pts
All criteria from the first column are missing.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLimitations
Using information from the required article and your own words, summarize one limitation reported in the study. Provide details.
20.0 pts
Thoroughly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.
18.0 pts
Mostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details.
16.0 pts
Minimally summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria is missing. Fair details are provided.
8.0 pts
Poorly summarizes the criteria in the first the column. Vague details are provided.
0.0 pts
All criteria from the first column are missing.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFindings/Discussion
Using information from the required article and your own words, summarize one of the authors\’ findings/discussion reported in the study. Include one interesting detail you learned from reading the study. Provide details.
20.0 pts
Thoroughly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.
18.0 pts
Mostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details.
16.0 pts
Minimally summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria is missing. Fair details are provided.
8.0 pts
Poorly summarizes the criteria in the first the column. Vague details are provided.
0.0 pts
All criteria from the first column are missing.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReading Research Literature
Summarize why it is important for you to read and understand research literature. Summarize what you learned from completing the reading research literature activity worksheet. Provide details.
30.0 pts
Thoroughly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.
26.0 pts
Mostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details.
24.0 pts
Minimally summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria is missing. Fair details are provided.
11.0 pts
Poorly summarizes the criteria in the first the column. Vague details are provided.
0.0 pts
All criteria from the first column are missing.
30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly Writing, Mechanics, Organization, Spelling, Sentence Structure, Grammar
10.0 pts
Excellent writing, mechanics, organization, spelling, sentence structure, grammar. No errors or 1-2 errors noted.
6.0 pts
Good writing, mechanics, organization, spelling, sentence structure, grammar. A few errors noted.
4.0 pts
Fair writing, mechanics, organization, spelling, sentence structure, grammar. Some errors noted.
3.0 pts
Poor writing, mechanics, organization, spelling, sentence structure, grammar. Many errors noted.
0.0 pts
Very poor writing, mechanics, and organization. Errors throughout are noted. Writing is difficult to understand or follow.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA In-Text Formatting for Cited Sentences
10.0 pts
Excellent APA in-text formatting with no errors. Uses mostly your own words with no more than two direct quotes.
5.0 pts
Good APA formatting. Uses APA in-text citation formatting with 1-2 errors noted.
4.0 pts
Fair APA formatting. Uses APA in-text citation formatting with some errors noted or does not use in-text citation formatting.
3.0 pts
Poor APA formatting with many errors noted.
0.0 pts
Very poor APA with errors noted throughout.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequired RRL Worksheet and Required Article Use
0.0 pts
0 points deducted Required RRL Worksheet used for this assignment and Required Article used for this assignment. 0 points deducted
0.0 pts
20 points (10%) deducted Required RRL Worksheet NOT used and/or Required Article NOT used for this assignment results in a deduction of 20 points (10%). 20 points deducted
0.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Deduction
0.0 pts
0 point deduction
Submitted on time
0.0 pts
Not submitted on time – Points deducted
1 day late = 10 deduction; 2 days late = 20 deduction; 3 days late = 30 deduction; 4 days late = 40 deduction; 5 days late = 50 deduction; 6 days late = 60 deduction; 7 days late = 70 deduction; Score of 0 if more than 7 days late
